View Full Version : Adobe Streamline Vs. Macromedia Flash
bluehickey
02-01-2005, 09:48 AM
Just wondering which of you out there knows which program does a better job of converting bitmap images into vector: Flash or streamline? I know how it does in flash and I've never been too impressed with it. Those of you who have used Streamline also, do you think it does a better job and give a cleaner vector line?
Let me know your thoughts...I,m thinking about purchasing Streamline for future projects but need to know first if it is definitely better than Flash's capabilities.
Splatman
02-01-2005, 10:43 AM
..but I haven't ever used Flash to trace vector images!
I have, however, used Streamline for years. It has a lot of flexibility in allowing you to adjust tolerances, points and what-not. Batch processing as well, I believe.
Anyhoo, as I say, I can't speak for Flash on this one, but I do like Streamline!
Cheers!
Splatman :D
ScatteredLogical
02-01-2005, 12:25 PM
I downloaded the demo and it seemed like one of the filters in Photoshop. For that matter, I'd say it's pretty effective in the realm of line-arting line art. A strong possibility exists I misunderstood its intentions though.
motionmilitia
02-01-2005, 03:30 PM
I recommend using Streamline over the Trace Bitmap feature in Flash... much better control.
vBulletin® v3.7.5, Copyright ©2000-2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.